Hi, for exercise 2, if you have passed all the tests, that is a good sign. However, it would still be better to review the code to make sure everything is implemented correctly.
One potential issue to check is whether you have accidentally hard-coded the mean and standard deviation values when passing them into the transformations. Please verify that the mean and standard deviation are being passed as variables (calculated or provided dynamically) rather than fixed values written directly in the code.
Thanks for the attention to this matter. No, the varaibles arent hardcoded and i did multiple submissions and in the recent one excercise 2 is graded full marks and now excercise 3 is failing. Each Submission is giving grader error for a different excercise.
this is kind of new experience by autograder, each submission is showing different exercise with failed submission
did you try the approach of completely deleting the assignment file, restoring the work file, re-doing the file and re-submitting??
The issue is solved now. The problem was from my part. My implementation define_transformations function Excerise 2 was actually correct but in Excercise 3 when intializing this function i was passing as arguments the mean and std global variables but they were already passed as parameters when defining the function. So when i removed the arguments from the function intialization. The grader worked perfectly. Apparently this was causing the grader to behave in abnormal ways.
I Apologize if I have caused inconvenience to anyone.
i was passing again the global varaibles as arguments.
