Where it is mentioned? Please share the full error.
sorry I was seeing the parameter section mention wrong output.
I guess I got the test passed 
but not happy
This part is still a bit not understandable particularly the code part. Theoretically understandable
Itâs completely normal to encounter challenges while working with code. Once Prof. Andrew Ng said âto become good at anything, the first step is to suc* at it. If youâve succeeded at suc**** at AI â congratulations, youâre on your way!*.â
maybe checking this code after some days clear your doubts.
Thank you I passed the grader. From all the mistake I understood one thing, the dictionary indices should be mentioned with the word indices for the X to find the choice of words to create.
for the poem section in assignment, I thought I can put first line my own written poem 
Got an error. Thanks for complimenting how bad I am at AI 
No one is good at AI. Everyone is bad. Some are more bad and some are less bad. Those who never stop learning, are less bad.
PS: You can post your error and our mentors will be happy to guide you.
Actually I have a suggestion, what I noticed deep learning ai course has to be merged with TensorFlow developer course.
Point why I felt
I started tensor flow course after Andrew mentioned in one of the 3rd course of deep learning ai. I took the suggestion and it helped a lot in both deep learning ai course as well as in tensor flow course to understand the neural network more better. because last 3 courses of deep learning course requires tensor flow(Keras) to be used. The instructor in the Tensor flow is awesome in his explanation of each every step of coding which made assignment very easy.
Thank you for your feedback. But I think a little bit different.
- DLS covers the deep learning concepts from scratch while the TF course only covers the TF, not the mathematics. So, keeping them separate is a good idea.
- Wherever TF is used in DLS, proper introduction and guidance are already provided.
- Merging both specialization will be very long course. Very long. And, that scares, demotivates, and bore the learners.
1 Like
First thing I do when I encounter error that I can not resolve (or unwilling to) , post it to chatGPT and ask for an explanation of the error and the corrected code. Works most of the time and get some new coding ideas too!!
1 Like
I strongly suspect that doing that as a way of debugging your code would violate the Code of Conduct (students must submit only their own work).
1 Like
Thatâs an excellent observation. I hadnât considered the fact that this assignment was meant for students. In the past, calculators were prohibited during exams as a way to assess studentsâ arithmetic abilities. However, over time, calculators were allowed, and exams were adjusted accordingly. Now, with the advent of ChatGPT, it serves as the modern-day âcalculator.â It ultimately falls upon the examiners to determine whether ChatGPT can be utilized. Personally, I believe that in the future, it will likely be permitted, and examiners will need to adapt to this new reality when designing exams and assignments.
Warning: The write up was refined by chatGPT. My own writing is given below. Based on this observation, I believe chatGPT should be allowed as it will lead to better writing (or coding) in the long run. Thank you
Good point. I did not realise that this was an student assignment. There was time when calculators were banned in exams as arithmetic skills were also tested in exams. However later calculators were permitted and exams suitably modified. Now chatGPT is the latest âcalculatorâ. It up to the examiners to decide if chatGPT can be used. My own guess is that it will be allowed in due course and examiners have to accommodate this new reality in designing the exams and assignments.
Students should not attempt to pass the grader using work that is not their own.