Agentic AI / M3 Graded Lab Exercise 2 failed test

Hi,

I’m not sure to understand the error

Failed test case: reflection should mention Strengths, Limitations, Suggestions, Opportunities.
Expected: ['strengths', 'limitations', 'suggestions', 'opportunities']
Got: []

The LLM response output looks fine to me

{
  "reflection": {
    "strengths": "The report provides a clear focus on recurrent novae, which is a specific and interesting area of research. It outlines the significance of the topic and hints at the complexity of the phenomena involved.",
    "limitations": "The report lacks citations and references, which are essential for supporting claims and providing credibility. Additionally, the structure is somewhat disorganized, making it difficult for readers to follow the main arguments. There is also a lack of depth in the analysis of the subject matter.",
    "suggestions": "Incorporate relevant citations to support claims made in the report. Improve the structure by organizing the content into clear sections such as introduction, methodology, findings, and conclusion. Expand on the analysis by including more detailed explanations and examples of recurrent novae. Consider adding visuals or diagrams to illustrate key points.",
    "opportunities": "There is an opportunity to engage with recent research in the field of astrophysics, particularly studies related to recurrent novae. Collaborating with experts or referencing current literature could enhance the report's credibility and relevance. Additionally, the report could explore future research directions or implications of findings in the context of broader astronomical phenomena."
  },
  "revised_report": "Title: Understanding Recurrent Novae: A Comprehensive Overview\n\nIntroduction:\nRecurrent novae are a fascinating class of astronomical events characterized by the repeated outbursts of a binary star system. These systems typically consist of a white dwarf and a companion star, where material is transferred from the companion to the white dwarf, leading to thermonuclear explosions on its surface. This report aims to provide an overview of recurrent novae, their significance in astrophysics, and recent findings in the field.\n\nMethodology:\nThis report synthesizes existing literature on recurrent novae, drawing from peer-reviewed articles and observational data. Key studies include those by [Author et al., Year] and [Author et al., Year], which provide insights into the mechanisms driving these explosive events.\n\nFindings:\nRecurrent novae are distinct from classical novae due to their periodic nature, with some systems exhibiting eruptions every few years. For example, the recurrent nova RS Ophiuchi has been observed to erupt approximately every 15 years. The study of these events not only enhances our understanding of stellar evolution but also contributes to our knowledge of the chemical enrichment of the galaxy.\n\nDiscussion:\nThe implications of recurrent novae extend beyond mere observation; they play a crucial role in the synthesis of heavy elements in the universe. Recent research has suggested that the outbursts of recurrent novae may contribute significantly to the population of Type Ia supernovae, which are vital for measuring cosmic distances.\n\nConclusion:\nIn conclusion, recurrent novae represent a critical area of study within astrophysics. By continuing to investigate these phenomena, researchers can uncover more about the life cycles of stars and the dynamics of binary systems. Future research should focus on utilizing advanced observational techniques and theoretical models to further elucidate the processes involved in recurrent novae.\n\nReferences:\n[Author et al., Year]. Title of the relevant study. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page numbers.\n[Author et al., Year]. Title of another relevant study. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page numbers."
}
{
  "reflections": {
    "strengths": "The report addresses a relevant and interesting topic in the field of astronomy, specifically focusing on recurrent novae. It demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter and highlights key aspects that are important for further research.",
    "limitations": "The report lacks citations to support its claims, which undermines its credibility. Additionally, it does not provide a clear structure or organization, making it difficult for readers to follow the arguments. There is also a lack of depth in the analysis, with some points needing further elaboration.",
    "suggestions": "Incorporate citations to reputable sources to substantiate claims made in the report. Improve the structure by organizing the content into clear sections such as introduction, methodology, findings, and conclusion. Expand on the analysis by providing more detailed explanations and examples related to recurrent novae.",
    "opportunities": "There is an opportunity to enhance the report by including recent research findings and advancements in the study of recurrent novae. Engaging with current literature could provide a more comprehensive view of the topic and highlight areas for future research."
  },
  "revised_report": "Title: Understanding Recurrent Novae: A Comprehensive Overview\n\nIntroduction:\nRecurrent novae are a fascinating class of astronomical events characterized by the repeated outbursts of certain binary star systems. These phenomena occur when a white dwarf star accretes material from its companion star, leading to thermonuclear explosions on its surface. This report aims to provide an overview of recurrent novae, their mechanisms, and their significance in the field of astrophysics.\n\nMechanisms of Recurrent Novae:\nThe process of a recurrent nova begins when the white dwarf accumulates hydrogen-rich material from its companion star. As the pressure and temperature increase, this material eventually ignites, resulting in a dramatic increase in brightness. Notable examples of recurrent novae include RS Ophiuchi and T Pyxidis, which have been observed to undergo multiple outbursts.\n\nRecent Research Findings:\nRecent studies have shown that the frequency of outbursts in recurrent novae can vary significantly. For instance, research conducted by Smith et al. (2022) indicates that environmental factors, such as the mass of the companion star and the distance between the stars, play a crucial role in determining the outburst frequency. These findings suggest that a deeper understanding of the binary systems involved is essential for predicting future eruptions.\n\nConclusion:\nRecurrent novae represent an important area of study within astrophysics, offering insights into stellar evolution and the dynamics of binary systems. By incorporating recent research and expanding on the mechanisms behind these phenomena, we can enhance our understanding of the universe. Future research should focus on gathering more observational data to further elucidate the complexities of recurrent novae."
}

hi @jdelfosse

For the below instructions

Define the prompt. A multi-line f-string is typically used for this.

Remember it should ask the model to output ONLY valid JSON with this structure:

{{ “reflection”: “”, “revised_report”: “” }

Developer wants you to add Guidelines mentioning those 4 features for reflection and then also mention revision of the report that includes suggestions and improve the clarity of response LLM provides.

Use this instructions given in instructions under exercise 2 (Read the detail: points)

I finally simplified the prompt and got it right.

Still not sure to spot the differences with previous output

{
  "reflection": {
    "strengths": "The report presents a clear focus on recurrent novae, which is a relevant and interesting topic in the field of astronomy. The structure of the report is logical, allowing for a coherent flow of information.",
    "limitations": "The report lacks citations to support the claims made, which undermines its credibility. Additionally, it does not provide sufficient depth in the analysis of recurrent novae, which may leave readers wanting more detailed information.",
    "suggestions": "To improve the report, it is essential to include citations for all claims made. This would enhance the report's reliability and academic rigor. Furthermore, expanding on the mechanisms behind recurrent novae and their implications in astrophysics would provide a more comprehensive understanding.",
    "opportunities": "There is an opportunity to explore recent advancements in the study of recurrent novae, including observational data and theoretical models. Incorporating these elements could significantly enrich the report and engage a broader audience."
  },
  "revised_report": "This report on recurrent novae has been revised to include appropriate citations for all claims made. Additionally, it has been expanded to provide a more in-depth analysis of the mechanisms behind recurrent novae, including recent advancements in observational techniques and theoretical frameworks. The revised report aims to enhance its academic rigor and provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic."
}
{
  "reflection": {
    "strengths": "The report addresses a specific topic, recurrent novae, which is a relevant area of research in astrophysics. The structure suggests a clear focus on the subject matter.",
    "limitations": "The report lacks citations and references, which are essential for supporting claims in academic writing. Additionally, the content appears to be underdeveloped and may not provide sufficient depth or analysis.",
    "suggestions": "To improve the report, it is crucial to include relevant citations to support the claims made. Expanding on the discussion of recurrent novae, including recent findings and theoretical implications, would enhance the report's credibility and depth.",
    "opportunities": "There is an opportunity to explore recent advancements in the study of recurrent novae, such as new observational data or theoretical models. Collaborating with experts in the field could provide valuable insights and strengthen the report."
  },
  "revised_report": "This report on recurrent novae will be revised to include appropriate citations and references to support its claims. The content will be expanded to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the topic, incorporating recent research findings and theoretical perspectives. Additionally, the report will seek to engage with current debates in the field and consider potential future research directions."
}
 All tests passed!