Joe they are similar in agentic design pattern, the only difference i remember when I had run down both labs was one lab had much simpler and 1 step method where as the second hand two agents or LLMs doing similar work, that’s all the difference i remember when I checked the output.
, the only difference i remember when I had run down both labs was one lab had much simpler and 1 step method where as the second hand two agents or LLMs doing similar work, that’s all the difference i remember when I checked the output.
In my observation both labs used 2 models, though the UGL1 did have a single step process to generate the final code while UGL 2 broke it into 2 different steps (a & b) as follows
What I am trying to understand/validate is, for UGL 1 and UGL 2 to be equivalent, UGL 1 would have to be structured as:
UGL 1 a - LLM 1: Generate Python Code v1 + Execute and generate graph → LLM 2: (Code V1 <not including actual output/graph>) → Revised Code V2 i.e. review based on code alone from LLM 1