Hello everyone,
This is perhaps a philosophical/semantics question but I was just wondering about this whole approach of designating ratings for someone who had not provided any ratings before (as discussed in the video).
More specifically, I can understand the mathematical footwork to provide starting guesses for Eve in the example provided.
However, is it not a stretch to assume that we have sufficient intuition about someone when there is absolutely no record of any rating? I would hate being bunched up with the average when my movie tastes might be very different to the mean.
Perhaps this is really just a starting point when you have nothing else to go on but this assumption still leaves me uncertain.
What to you think?