Hi, I just was wondering if this hint was intentionally left without the comma
![]()
Did it mean to say? (Because in the lines above, it shows it with a comma)
![]()
Hi, I just was wondering if this hint was intentionally left without the comma
![]()
Did it mean to say? (Because in the lines above, it shows it with a comma)
![]()
Hi, @Yousif.
You’re right. Without the comma, it’s no longer slicing the column dimension, but rather slicing rows using the start:stop:step notation. As you guessed, it should read: mini_batch_X = shuffled_X[:, i:j].
Thank you for taking the time to report this!