Bug found in comments - C3M4 - Question 3

[Nevermnd]

Hi, I found a bug in the comments here. It took me forever to figure this out because the code is basically just given to us, but:

# Check if the third layer (i+2 > len(child))exists

Is wrong.

[Deepti_Prasad]

you haven’t explained what is the bug??

[Nevermnd]

It is < not >. You can see this clearly if you look at the hints, but I was trying to avoid doing so.

Also, I found this lesson incredibly hard and confusing. Too much new info is introduced (or the first part is okay, but QAT is hard to wrap your head around whats happening).

[Deepti_Prasad]

I had the same feeling when I did the last week module

infact I felt pruning and qat, both should have been explained in separate courses or atleast in modules, so one could practice more with different techniques that instructors explains in videos of pruning and qat.

I left a detailed feedback at end of course specialisation regarding how beautiful fundamentals had detailed orientation of collective reason and application a learner can apply where as last week module caused more query of when the structured pruning or unstructured pruning is done or how these two pruning techniques are selected based on a model architecture, or data that one is working upon.

Hope they have read my feedback and taken considering to introduce more course these different techniques that pytorch framework utilises.

[Nevermnd]

I would also say that Pytorch Lightning needs more explanation too IMHO.